Published
2024-09-17
Issue
Section
Monográfico
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
As a whole, the author(s) declare that ( download model ):
1.- Original and innovative contributions are made through this text. I/we certify that this work has not been published in whole or in part by any other means nor is it under consideration for publication in another journal.
2.- I/we acquire the commitment to accept the writing, publication, review and evaluation standards considered by Fonseca, Journal of Communication.
3.- I/we take responsibility for the content of the text that I/we send and for having contributed to the conception, design and execution of the work, analysis and interpretation of data and for having participated in the writing of the text and its possible revisions as well. as in the approval of the version that I/we finally send.
4.- I/we have been informed that changes in style of the manuscript may occur but that, nevertheless and in any case, the final galleys will be sent to me/us before the text, in case of favorable evaluation, is definitively published as an article. I/we undertake to acknowledge receipt of said proofs as well as, once verified, to give approval for their publication in the shortest possible time. I/we understand that we give tacit approval to the galleys if I/we do not send a response within 10 calendar days of receiving them.
5.- I/we affirm to know that the publication of an article in Fonseca, Journal of Communication does not entail any cost or remuneration.
6.- I/we declare to be free of any personal and/or commercial association that may pose a conflict of interest in connection with the article submitted as well as having respected the ethical principles of research.
7.- The undersigned author(s) transfer/we transfer the property rights (copyright) of this work to Fonseca, Journal of Communication so that it may be published under a Creative Commons license (in the modality indicated at the bottom of the main page of Fonseca, Journal of Communication. I/we assign the editing and reproduction rights.
How to Cite
A STUDY ON THE REVISION OF ADOLESCENT ACADEMIC BURDEN ATTITUDE SCALE
Guoliang Deng
PhD, Krirk University, International College, Bangkok, Thailand
Abstract
Background: The problem of excessive academic burden among adolescents has been hindering the implementation of quality education, and the effective measurement of adolescents’ attitudes towards academic burden is particularly important for later research. Objectives: To revise the Academic Burden Attitude Scale so as to increase its convenience for future scholars. Methods: The questionnaire survey method was used to distribute and collect the Academic Burden Attitude Scale compiled by Zhang Feng et al., and 500 (boys = 301, girls = 199) middle school students in Sichuan, China were distributed and collected by exploratory factor analysis. Validation factor analysis was conducted to distribute and recycle 300 (boys = 179, girls = 121) middle school students in Sichuan, China. Results: Through the revision of the Academic Burden Attitude Scale, the Academic Burden Attitude Scale was finally obtained, which consisted of three subscales and a total of 35 items. There were four common factors with a root greater than 1 (1.004 - 4.140) in the cognitive component of academic burden attitude, and the cumulative contribution rate of the scale was 73.703%. The emotional component of academic burden attitude showed three common factors (1.198 - 4.034) with characteristic roots greater than 1, and the cumulative contribution rate of the scale was 73.094%. There were four common factors (1.054 - 4.538) with characteristic roots greater than 1, and the cumulative contribution rate of the scale was 72.236%. The overall reliability of the revised Academic Burden Attitude Scale was 0.929 and the halving coefficient was 0.815, indicating high reliability. The confirmatory factor analysis of AMOS 22.0 was used in each subscale of the questionnaire, and the structural validation analysis values reached the significance standard (P <0.001), and the fitting indicators of goodness reached the suitability standard. Discussion: The 35-item version of the Academic Burden Attitude Scale revised in this study meets the relevant statistical standards and can be used as an evaluation tool for related studies.
